Skip to main content

Our entire industry is in motion: While we have already purchased two companies this year, some other competitors seem to develop differently. Already two "multi-nationals" may soon fall again into their formerly separate parts. Another, however, our "favorite competitor" reports falling sales figures in the last quarterly report. From our perspective: no surprise.

Right now I have more or less five concrete offers on the table for acquisition opportunities. Some of the companies have become too small for the market, have problems with the banks, or no longer fit well into the vendors' channel strategy. That would be a nice opportunity to increase our growth even further, were it not for the unpleasant question about the corporate assessment of potential candidates.

I often do not know if I should laugh or cry. Here is a selection of misguided assumptions from company owners ... I declare that I have heard all these phrases in at least five languages:

- "My company makes 15% margin in distribution, and will always remain so. No, there is no trend towards declining margins. In my country XXX it is quite unlike anywhere else."

- "It does not matter what the company is worth! The purchase price must be high enough so that I can comfortably retire!"

- The escalation: If there is more than one owner, then the purchase price must also be higher, because they all want to retire comfortably.

- "No, I cannot give any guarantees for amounts outstanding or the stock value, of course. Assume that everything is 100% recoverable."

- "Actually, the company would have earned much more, but I'm paid such a high salary." (because of course the company does not need Management anymore after the acquisition)

- "We only make losses, because we want to save on taxes."

Not even our American competitors fall for something like this. :)

In most cases once a vendor makes the decision to terminate the contract with the distributor, the company's value suddenly drops to zero or below.

My dear people, we live in 2012. There was a financial crisis, and acquisitions always have to be cash-positive. This is possible, and can also be good for both sides. But without a more realistic view of things, it does not work. As you know, one can not bake equity.

Anyway, I will tirelessly continue to negotiate (I am, after all, paid to do so), and go and find a creative solution. But in case of doubt, we prefer to grow "organically" rather than pay a lot of money for others to retire on.